so as commented on that change and as discussed in yesterday's scrum, we will also need to address the '--install-hash-override' as well at some point ie. the version that is installed.
This change is addressing the '--upgrade-hash-override' i.e. the target/upgrade-to version.
FTR I found an example of the issue for the upgrade-from version this morning
09:55 < marios> arxcruz: just seen a case of missing containers for the 'install' version (not the 'upgrade to' version) there.
That being said, I think we should go ahead with this especially if we are seeing it more frequently hitting the target/upgrade-to version, but bearing in mind we aren't quite done until we can override the install version too.
https:/ /review. opendev. org/c/openstack /tripleo- ci/+/813629/ 9..10#message- e0a0151ce11c43a 71e3e03e7464dab 7e99234d77
so as commented on that change and as discussed in yesterday's scrum, we will also need to address the '--install- hash-override' as well at some point ie. the version that is installed.
This change is addressing the '--upgrade- hash-override' i.e. the target/upgrade-to version.
FTR I found an example of the issue for the upgrade-from version this morning
* https:/ /e4cf1ab71b6ca5 f5dc46- fe390436bababd6 5005a5c1c9412b5 32.ssl. cf5.rackcdn. com/815775/ 1/gate/ tripleo- ci-centos- 8-undercloud- upgrade/ de8cbed/ logs/undercloud /home/zuul/ undercloud_ install. log 04ed-6e6e- aa45-000000000d a8 | FATAL | Container image prepare | undercloud | error={"changed": false, "error": "Not found image: http:// 104.130. 219.215: 5001/v2/ tripleowallaby/ openstack- rsyslog/ manifests/ 801901288645907 5100400fbcc95c3 6a", "msg": "Error running container image prepare: Not found image: http:// 104.130. 219.215: 5001/v2/ tripleowallaby/ openstack- rsyslog/ manifests/ 801901288645907 5100400fbcc95c3 6a", "params": {}, "success": false}
* 2021-10-28 20:43:10.182778 | bc764e10-
09:55 < marios> arxcruz: just seen a case of missing containers for the 'install' version (not the 'upgrade to' version) there.
That being said, I think we should go ahead with this especially if we are seeing it more frequently hitting the target/upgrade-to version, but bearing in mind we aren't quite done until we can override the install version too.