Comment 3 for bug 1838412

Revision history for this message
John Fulton (jfulton-org) wrote :

On our path to fix scenario010-multinode (and this bug) we encountered and fixed one bug:

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1838556

and it looks like we'll do the same with this bug:

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1839625

So this CI job has been good in that it's flushing out issues people will probably hit in the field and we can fix them before they do.

Yes, it's non-voting (multinode jobs are less stable so that means they don't block) but at the same time it's valuable because it's testing the more likely scenario (a separate undercloud) and finding things that standalone jobs don't find.