Log in / Register
tripleo
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1744359
Comment #4
Comment 4 for bug 1744359
Revision history for this message
Ihar Hrachyshka (ihar-hrachyshka)
wrote
on 2018-01-19
:
#4
I guess having haproxy prefix is backwards compatible enough to allow it to slip like that.
I guess having haproxy prefix is backwards compatible enough to allow it to slip like that.
I guess having haproxy prefix is backwards compatible enough to allow it to slip like that.