Comment 1 for bug 1686716
Revision history for this message
| Dan Prince (dan-prince) wrote Re: Undercloud deploy is not idempotent and takes a hard way to re-apply | #1 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
The new t-h-t was specifically designed not to reused an existing stack. Aside from the password and containers issues you mentioned above please do note that currently the heat stack was actually designed to be ephemeral in this regard.