Log in / Register
timekpr
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1643335
Comment #4
Comment 4 for bug 1643335
Revision history for this message
Eduards Bezverhijs (mjasnik)
wrote
on 2019-04-09
:
#4
This needs to be addressed with Timekpr-nExT, for this version, nope.
This needs to be addressed with Timekpr-nExT, for this version, nope.
This needs to be addressed with Timekpr-nExT, for this version, nope.