Comment 10 for bug 90824

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Notes:
> > Given comment #6, I would suggest that when a message is
> > copied from one folder to another that the header is either:
> > immediately reread OR it is copied with the email. I don't know
> > enough about IMAP or whatever to know if that's reasonable or not.
>
> Marking a header as "read" when copied is absolutely the wrong thing
> to do. And isn't the header already copied as-is with the message?
> I think the problem you described has more to do with deleting
> (moving to trash) multiple messages that haven't actually been read
> -- marking/moving as deleting is not the same thing as reading.
> Perhaps you want deleted messages marked "read" at the same time?
> Either way, copying isn't the problem; for instance, my deleted
> messages get marked as "deleted" and not moved to a "Trash" folder.

When I'm talking about "reread" in my message, I mean the header is
reread from the mail server, not that the message is marked "read". I
apologize for not being clear.

Let my again:

Given comment #6, I would suggest that when a message is copied from
one folder to another that either:
 1) The header is read again from the mail server
 or
 2) The cached header is passed to the new folder so it doesn't have
    to be read again from the mail server.
 I don't know enough about IMAP or other mail stores to know if option
 2 is reasonable or not.

I hope that rewrite helps and sorry about re-using read in two
different ways. :-)

Ciao!