Comment 262 for bug 52667

(In reply to comment #209)
> (From update of attachment 376945 [details])
> Assuming this is obsolete.. ?

Yes. 377404, or one of the later patches, should have obsoleted it. I suppose I forgot to click that checkbox. My apologies.

I have no plans on updating the patches after 377404 and 376946 (other than issues you raise/suggestions you make), so if you're feeling in a reviewing sort of mood, have at it. :)

(Oh, and 376946 which should now be based on top of 377404, instead of 376945.)

Thanks,
Blake.