Comment 3 for bug 1537242

Hi Ted. Ah, I see. So it'd be the scope to do the work, that makes more sense, yes. Long story short, the scope only does some reads (no writes) and is not tightly integrated with the app, so that'll make it challenging. To my best knowledge, there are currently other priorities (and critical bugs) to be handled, but I suppose someone could eventually look into that. I'll flip the status back. I do agree that's the way it should be, I'm just afraid there's nobody to do it - but hey, maybe someone from the community would make a contribution on that front :)