Comment 9 for bug 1328786

Revision history for this message
Robert Roth (evfool) wrote : Re: Plugs don't support light-locker [$50]

Looking at light-locker-settings[1] (a simple tool to configure light-locker) it does stop the existing light-locker process and restart it with the new set of command line options. This would be overkill IMHO from an instant-apply GUI, as after changing any of the components, you would have to find the process, stop it, build the new argument list and restart the process.

The best would be to have gsettings for this, so I agree with cameronnemo that we should add support for gsettings and get that accepted upstream, and then use those settings in the privacy plug.

[1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~light-locker-settings-team/light-locker-settings/trunk/view/head:/light-locker-settings/light-locker-settings.py