commit 3ad877323978dcf4130e9543a2678bb928c1ecb8
Author: Tim Burke <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Mar 15 19:30:38 2017 +0000
Version DLOs, just like every other type of object
Previously, requests involving DLOs would bypass versioned_writes:
* Any existing DLOs wouldn't get copied to the archive container during
overwrites (or deletes, with history-mode), so there would be no
evidence they had ever existed.
* Any new DLOs wouldn't copy overwritten objects to the archive
container, potentially leading to data loss.
Now, DLOs will behave like every other type of object under
versioned_writes.
Reviewed: https:/ /review. openstack. org/446142 /git.openstack. org/cgit/ openstack/ swift/commit/ ?id=3ad87732397 8dcf4130e9543a2 678bb928c1ecb8
Committed: https:/
Submitter: Jenkins
Branch: master
commit 3ad877323978dcf 4130e9543a2678b b928c1ecb8
Author: Tim Burke <email address hidden>
Date: Wed Mar 15 19:30:38 2017 +0000
Version DLOs, just like every other type of object
Previously, requests involving DLOs would bypass versioned_writes:
* Any existing DLOs wouldn't get copied to the archive container during
overwrites (or deletes, with history-mode), so there would be no
evidence they had ever existed.
* Any new DLOs wouldn't copy overwritten objects to the archive
container, potentially leading to data loss.
Now, DLOs will behave like every other type of object under writes.
versioned_
Change-Id: I488e13eead2f33 dd272d03f6f898a dc52fc7fdad 01979eafefb253d 1a60b65b837 026deb50fc9d260 64a8da81cd7
Related-Change: Ie899290b3312e2
Related-Change: Ib5b29a19e1d577
Closes-Bug: #1626989