© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
Umm... this reported "bug" is in a test *fake* - and the description even indicates the behavior is correct regardless if the implementation is obvious. It seems to me unnecessary overhead to open bugs for this sort of thing - am I missing some sort of subtle process value here?