Log in / Register
subiquity
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #2032725
Comment #2
Comment 2 for bug 2032725
Revision history for this message
Michael Hudson-Doyle (mwhudson)
wrote
on 2023-08-23
:
#2
I don't think that's relevant here, this is all for the replacement of the old process.
I don't think that's relevant here, this is all for the replacement of the old process.
I don't think that's relevant here, this is all for the replacement of the old process.