passive is specified by SU ...
don't get me wrong here.. StrongDC++'s behaviour is correct.
its a bug in older DC++ to not determine Active/Passive by SU but by U4/I4...
this is about backwardscompatibility/workaround to function with a buggy implementation...
passive is specified by SU ...
don't get me wrong here..
StrongDC++'s behaviour is correct.
its a bug in older DC++ to not determine Active/Passive by SU but by U4/I4...
this is about backwardscompat ibility/ workaround to function with a buggy implementation...