Comment 7 for bug 206778

Revision history for this message
Szabolcs Molnár (fleet) wrote :

Sounds good :) (no, not "good".. rather "great" ;)) )

Just a question about PMs.. you wrote that "there's also no warning if pms go through another hub".. Theoretically how can it happen? I mean when you open a private message window, the PMs in it goes through the initial hub, right? I think if the connection is closed with the original hub, it can go through another one even if the client reconnecs, right? - Maybe this case dc++ could enter a line to the pm window telling the user that the connection with the preferred hub is lost, they have x more hub in common and those will be used for pming. DC++ don't have to track it anymore, but the user will know that it's not ensured that their pm goes through the original hub. If the sender now wants to ensure what hub is used, he may close and reopen the PM window. But you're right, a drop-down list would be better. Just playing with my thougts.