Comment 28 for bug 1710443

Revision history for this message
Alexander Wolf (alexwolf) wrote :

> In the future, if and when stellarium supports specification of longitudes by skycultures (as originally requested in this thread), we may elide this roundabout "boundary" technique.

Funny. Please explain me one interesting result, who go from quoted sentence: what difference between boundary line, who leaves through the ecliptical longitude 13 degrees and some partition marker, who located on the ecliptical longitude 13 degrees? This is different 13 degrees in one scale? :D

I know how I can "put the constellations in described partitions" - just introducing a variable size of the degree. For example in the first nakshatra one degree will 0.8 of "standard size" and in second nakshatra one degree should be equal 1,2 of "standard size".

So that:
1) Current definition of partitions of nakshatra's is wrong
2) Current implementation of nakshatra's figures is wrong
3) Definition of partitions is given for one concrete date or epoch in the past and for modern time it's no have meaning.

You can select any "wrong" point :)