Activity log for bug #1214556

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2013-08-20 19:59:09 Ryan Ackerman bug added bug
2013-10-09 17:56:34 Grant Paton-Simpson sofastatistics: assignee Grant Paton-Simpson (launchpad-p-s)
2013-10-09 18:06:12 Grant Paton-Simpson sofastatistics: status New Confirmed
2013-10-09 18:06:22 Grant Paton-Simpson sofastatistics: importance Undecided Critical
2013-10-09 18:06:54 Grant Paton-Simpson bug added subscriber Grant Paton-Simpson
2013-10-09 18:08:57 Ryan Ackerman description The dataset I used was (9.4, 5.4, 6.6, 5.4, 6, 9.4, 8.9, 10, 9, 15, 12, 7.2, 7, 9, 8.1). In the histogram, it displays several entries as high as 25, though no number in my dataset was close. I was able to have the histogram display properly by changing any one number to a 1. I originally imported this dataset from Google Spreadsheets, but re-entered it by hand into SOFA with no effect. I generated a second random dataset of numbers between 0 and 10 (rounded to tenths), imported it into SOFA and found that again, the histograms were displaying higher numbers than existed in the dataset. The boxplot displayed perfectly for this dataset. The dataset I used was (9.4, 5.4, 6.6, 5.4, 6, 9.4, 8.9, 10, 9, 15, 12, 7.2, 7, 9, 8.1). In the histogram, it displays several entries as high as 25, though no number in my dataset was close. I was able to have the histogram display properly by changing any one number to a 1. I originally imported this dataset from Google Spreadsheets, but re-entered it by hand into SOFA with no effect. I generated a second random dataset of numbers between 0 and 10 (rounded to tenths), imported it into SOFA and found that again, the histograms were displaying higher numbers than existed in the dataset.
2013-10-09 19:02:36 Grant Paton-Simpson sofastatistics: status Confirmed Fix Committed
2013-10-14 08:15:29 Grant Paton-Simpson sofastatistics: status Fix Committed Fix Released