Comment 3 for bug 1607748

Oh and yes, the current snap I have on the store for 16 does use "lxd.lxc" right now which while it looks ugly is probably less confusing to our users than lxd.cmd which is a name we've never used anywhere online yet.

Another interesting problem with the current setup is that folks who install the lxd snap on a system that has the Ubuntu packaged lxd, will have the "lxd" command go to the lxd snap, so "lxd init" does configure the snapped LXD as expected, but then the "lxc" command will work and talk to their Ubuntu packaged lxd daemon rather than the snapped one (they have to use lxd.lxc for that).