is the "variant" widely supported? If not, given the substantial
difference between snappy and non-snappy systems, we might also use the
"Distributor ID", making that "Ubuntu Core" or "Ubuntu Personal" instead
of just "Ubuntu" when it's a snappy system. both deb-based server and
desktop could call themselves Ubuntu because their semantics for package
management are identical.
is the "variant" widely supported? If not, given the substantial
difference between snappy and non-snappy systems, we might also use the
"Distributor ID", making that "Ubuntu Core" or "Ubuntu Personal" instead
of just "Ubuntu" when it's a snappy system. both deb-based server and
desktop could call themselves Ubuntu because their semantics for package
management are identical.
Mark