Comment 1 for bug 2039052

Revision history for this message
Sebastien Bacher (seb128) wrote :

I think the title probably doesn't reflect what's going on, my guess is that the auto-refresh was already started in background by the time the hold command was issued

Unsure what would be the best outcome there. Having the install call cancel the ongoing refresh and install the specified revision after instead if returning an error? Or waiting for the ongoing transaction to be done to then install instead of returning?