Log in / Register
snapd
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1933392
Comment #3
Comment 3 for bug 1933392
Revision history for this message
Michael Vogt (mvo)
wrote
on 2021-06-30
:
Re: snapctl "error: access denied" on core 16-2.51 + Debian Stretch
#3
Would it be acceptable to have a newer snapd for stretch in something like -backports?
Would it be acceptable to have a newer snapd for stretch in something like -backports?
Would it be acceptable to have a newer snapd for stretch in something like -backports?