snapd

  1. Bug #1659153
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 1659153

Revision history for this message
Seth Arnold (seth-arnold) wrote : Re: [Bug 1659153] Re: /v2/find with select=private has different behaviour for queries and name searches

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 02:36:13AM -0000, Robert Ancell wrote:
> The question is, does select=private even need to exist? Since the JSON
> snap object have a private value, shouldn't all searches return private
> snaps if authorization is provided? The client can then filter the
> results if this is required.

What's the intention of the 'private' in 'private snaps'? Is the intention
to keep their existence secret? Or just the contents of the snap?

Thanks