El 12/07/16 a las 10:26, Mark Shuttleworth escribió:
> On 11/07/16 21:53, Leo Arias wrote:
> > It mentions the snapcraft list. I know what that is, but I bet many
> > people will not. Maybe add a link, or use the email address?
>
> yes, let's say '<email address hidden> mailing list'
We need to create such list, can we?
>
> > It says I can use devmode. In this case, devmode will not help because
> > my mistake is that I set an architecture but didn't include any binaries
> > for that archs. I don't know how to fix this. Some ideas that come to
> > mind are to show in the error the reason why the publishing checks
> > failed, or run the checks before attempting the upload.
>
> Ye, I think we want to provide more specific feedback on the checks that
> failed and how the user can address them.
Certainly, but this requires the store to provide such feedback, there's already a bug open for this but I will link this one as well just in case as the reasoning for it is better explained here.
>
> Mark
>
El 12/07/16 a las 10:26, Mark Shuttleworth escribió:
> On 11/07/16 21:53, Leo Arias wrote:
> > It mentions the snapcraft list. I know what that is, but I bet many
> > people will not. Maybe add a link, or use the email address?
>
> yes, let's say '<email address hidden> mailing list'
We need to create such list, can we?
>
> > It says I can use devmode. In this case, devmode will not help because
> > my mistake is that I set an architecture but didn't include any binaries
> > for that archs. I don't know how to fix this. Some ideas that come to
> > mind are to show in the error the reason why the publishing checks
> > failed, or run the checks before attempting the upload.
>
> Ye, I think we want to provide more specific feedback on the checks that
> failed and how the user can address them.
Certainly, but this requires the store to provide such feedback, there's already a bug open for this but I will link this one as well just in case as the reasoning for it is better explained here.
>
> Mark
>