Mark, so are you saying that *only* SHA3-384 should be supported? If so, why not more formats?
Also, currently my code supports this through the source-checksum tag:
- Raw md5, sha256, and sha512 checksums (support for more formats in progress)
- Location of a file that has a supported checksum format
- A URL for a file that has a supported checksum format
Are you suggesting that instead of going through source-checksum, that I use digest instead?
I'm just curious at what you are getting at, Mark.
Mark, so are you saying that *only* SHA3-384 should be supported? If so, why not more formats?
Also, currently my code supports this through the source-checksum tag:
- Raw md5, sha256, and sha512 checksums (support for more formats in progress)
- Location of a file that has a supported checksum format
- A URL for a file that has a supported checksum format
Are you suggesting that instead of going through source-checksum, that I use digest instead?
I'm just curious at what you are getting at, Mark.