Log in / Register
Snapcraft
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1582469
Comment #10
Comment 10 for bug 1582469
Revision history for this message
Gustavo Niemeyer (niemeyer)
wrote
on 2016-06-08
:
#10
Yes, just unfoo and refoo for all foo.
refooing dependents once foo refoos is footastic.
Yes, just unfoo and refoo for all foo. refooing dependents once foo refoos is footastic.
Yes, just unfoo and refoo for all foo.
refooing dependents once foo refoos is footastic.