I regularly raise this type of issue, not only with developers, but the specification Working Groups and even process WG.
It's not a fakesmile-only bug, but there is little point in authors using Fakesmile,
or at the very least they need to be aware of the issues.
which is difficult...
hence I raised this bug to publicise, and raise comments.
it can be closed, but the likelyhood is that someone else may either re-file,
or search harder and maybe in vain for an explanation...
it's a process bug, Fakesmile is part of the process, Fakesmile developers failed to understand, and ensure that there work had a life whilst partial support was.
I regularly raise this type of issue, not only with developers, but the specification Working Groups and even process WG.
It's not a fakesmile-only bug, but there is little point in authors using Fakesmile,
or at the very least they need to be aware of the issues.
which is difficult...
hence I raised this bug to publicise, and raise comments.
it can be closed, but the likelyhood is that someone else may either re-file,
or search harder and maybe in vain for an explanation...
it's a process bug, Fakesmile is part of the process, Fakesmile developers failed to understand, and ensure that there work had a life whilst partial support was.
regards