Comment 17 for bug 376155

fine, my apologies, fakesmil is broken because mozilla wont claim support...

hasFeature isn't going to be that useful to developers in the future as a concept, with this type of deliberate obstruction.

it would be kind if you could take the time to explain why it is important to mozilla not to claim support, nor disable partial SMIL support, when just for now, fakesmil is such a great implementation.

I'd hope that applications could be less monolithic, and this does require cooperation.
why do we need a spellchecker for each and every application that can edit?