Since including the BF field in the checkin response message is both an extension to the protocol /and/ exposes more personally identifiable information for patrons, it needs a configuration guard similar to the relais_extensions_to_msg24 (with a default value of false).
I'm removing the pullrequest tag on that basis, but the patches otherwise look good; they just need a supplement.
Since including the BF field in the checkin response message is both an extension to the protocol /and/ exposes more personally identifiable information for patrons, it needs a configuration guard similar to the relais_ extensions_ to_msg24 (with a default value of false).
I'm removing the pullrequest tag on that basis, but the patches otherwise look good; they just need a supplement.