This bug report wasn't very clear; apologies. The direction we should move in is to map project_id (as well as tenant_id) so that as tenant is phased out over the next few releases we can consistently provide information about who owns each resource. Internally we'll switch to project id as and when it becomes necessary (for instance, when the authorization middleware switches over).
This bug report wasn't very clear; apologies. The direction we should move in is to map project_id (as well as tenant_id) so that as tenant is phased out over the next few releases we can consistently provide information about who owns each resource. Internally we'll switch to project id as and when it becomes necessary (for instance, when the authorization middleware switches over).