(In reply to comment #44) > (From update of attachment 334117 [details]) > is this patch still wanted/needed?
Independent of the OpenLDAP functionality, the bugs / memory leaks in the current code are still issues.
(In reply to comment #44)
> (From update of attachment 334117 [details])
> is this patch still wanted/needed?
Independent of the OpenLDAP functionality, the bugs / memory leaks in the current code are still issues.