Comment 136 for bug 507089

Revision history for this message
In , Antoine-mechelynck-gmail (antoine-mechelynck-gmail) wrote :

(In reply to Maciej Puzio from comment #85)
> I find it somewhat ironic that a nearly nine year old bug of this magnitude
> has status: NEW.

Actually, a better label would be CONFIRMED rather than NEW. That's what NEW really means, it does not refer to the bug's age.