That's ok but what I wanted to say is that without changing source of existing screenlets they could only zoom like now.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:41 PM, jr <email address hidden> wrote:
> Another option for a 128x128 square in a 128x256 area is to center the > widget vertically and keep it sized at 128x128 > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of > Screenlets Dev Team, which is subscribed to Screenlets. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007985 > > Title: > Optional snap-to dimensions for screenlets > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/screenlets/+bug/1007985/+subscriptions > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~screenlets-dev > Post to : <email address hidden> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~screenlets-dev > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
That's ok but what I wanted to say is that without changing source of
existing screenlets they could only zoom like now.
On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:41 PM, jr <email address hidden> wrote:
> Another option for a 128x128 square in a 128x256 area is to center the /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1007985 /bugs.launchpad .net/screenlets /+bug/1007985/ +subscriptions _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _____ /launchpad. net/~screenlets -dev /launchpad. net/~screenlets -dev /help.launchpad .net/ListHelp
> widget vertically and keep it sized at 128x128
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of
> Screenlets Dev Team, which is subscribed to Screenlets.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Optional snap-to dimensions for screenlets
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>
> _______
> Mailing list: https:/
> Post to : <email address hidden>
> Unsubscribe : https:/
> More help : https:/
>