Comment 1 for bug 297307

Revision history for this message
Derick Eddington (derick-eddington) wrote : Re: [Bug 297307] [NEW] libraries need an installer and should be packaged and released

On Wed, 2008-11-12 at 18:00 +0000, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
> If you have an installation script (e.g., make install) for the
> libraries, and can manage to release them (e.g., tar gzip them) on
> regular intervals (e.g., once a year :-)), then packagers of linux
> distributions can pick the bundle and make it part of
> debian/ubuntu/fedora whatever.
>
> Yes, I know it's not fun, but it should not be too hard either. It
> makes the live of packagers easier (this was my observation when I
> released ikarus, because it had standard ./configure && make && make
> install build process, it was packaged for debian within a couple of
> days of release).
>
> It might not be too urgent to do so now, since I am yet to release
> 0.0.4, but just keep it in mind.

I'm not sure what I should do for "make" or "make install" because these
are R6RS libraries that are possibly compiled for different
implementations, possibly not, and need to go in some
implementation-specific search folder. Hopefully a tarball of
source-code is all packagers need and they can turn it into whatever
they want.