Comment 10 for bug 447269

Revision history for this message
Pete Myers (petemyers) wrote : Re: [Bug 447269] Re: Double line spacing is slightly too small

David,

I used the code from the first page of bibliography for the first page of
the appendix.

I figured we'd probably want to implement things consistently throughout the
class. It's just really unhelpful for us down the line if we have several
different solutions to the same problem!

It might be worth checkign that the second page of any particular appendix
formats with a single inch at the top.

I think you're right, though, I'm not sure if "vrule" is the "correct" way.
Before I found your class, I was halfway through implementing my own, and
I'd not used vrule to solve that problem.

That's the beauty of LaTeX though - a number of diferent solutinos can fit.

Pete

2009/10/15 David Purton <email address hidden>

> Oops - Sorry - regarding taking the Ridley stuff out - miss-read you -
> hope it merged without too much trouble.
>
> I'm going to open a new thread on headings, since I'm not as sure as I
> was before... and it's probably something good to think through all the
> implications of.
>
> The Appendix code looks good. I fixed up the alignment and also a
> problem where all the Appendix text was centred too ;).
>
> BTW, I aften use the \vrule technique to create the two inch top margins
> because I find it more reliable and it ensures the correct margin is
> returned on the next page. This could be just because I don't know what
> I'm doing though... :)
>
> --
> Double line spacing is slightly too small
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/447269
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of SBL LaTeX
> Drivers, which is subscribed to SBL LaTeX.
>