Comment 2 for bug 822712

* Josh Elsasser
> It would also be nice if --quit would simply set a flag to quit when command-line
> processing is finished, rather than simply expand into --eval '(quit)'. This would
> allow for situations such as sbcl --quit --eval '(something-which-uses-posix-argv)' foo bar baz

On the other hand, Zach's original description of a --quit option is closer to the behaviour of --eval and --load, and therefore perhaps less surprising than the more fancy mechanism.

My current thinking is that I'll implement the original description, but I do not have a particularly strong opinion either way.

Zach (or others): Do you prefer one over the other?