Comment 3 for bug 789497
Revision history for this message
| Paul Khuong (pvk) wrote Re: [Bug 789497] Re: wanted: better error reporting in ASSERT | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
35a32c5
(Get the code!)
Right, there's a slight bug in FLOAT-RADIX.
I think we should try and avoid duplicating temporary argument forms in the expansion. Currently, forms are copied for the initial and the step form in DO, and that's not good for compile times… especially when ASSERTs are nested (e.g. via inlining).
That'll probably be most easily achieved with TAGBODY.
Re CONSTANTP, you probably need to use the cross-compiler's version (sb!xc:constantp).