The solution to ulimit -v <smaller than expected>? Yes.
Solution to Xen issues? According to those trolls of #lisp (your truly included in that tarbrush, thanks) Xen > 3.1 should be fine.
Or are you saying that you don't get the "CATS ARE NICE" lossage on Xen if you turn up ulimit or ask for a smaller heap (aka dynamic space)? If so, please confirm, as that's news to me. Not impossible by any means, but not known either.
The solution to ulimit -v <smaller than expected>? Yes.
Solution to Xen issues? According to those trolls of #lisp (your truly included in that tarbrush, thanks) Xen > 3.1 should be fine.
Or are you saying that you don't get the "CATS ARE NICE" lossage on Xen if you turn up ulimit or ask for a smaller heap (aka dynamic space)? If so, please confirm, as that's news to me. Not impossible by any means, but not known either.