Comment 2 for bug 618387

Nikodemus Siivola <email address hidden> writes:

> The problem appears to be the (DECLARE (TYPE <SYMBOL> S)) declaration
> bogusly generated by PCL.

Huh. I was about to complain about the "bogusly" there, but I read in
clhs 4.3.7 that only a class's /proper name/ is valid as a type
declaration (in addition to the class itself). There's loose talk about
"name"s, too, but probably not enough to worry about.