Comment 40 for bug 313202

@stassats oops forgot about that "^^, that hack should be easily replaceable though
@vaartis about the boolean - i'm not responsible for the typing system. i think i saw some
         sbcl kludges that said that alien system doesn't really support less than byte types
         (in case you're hoping for bitfield); i'm pretty sure i tested char,
         try using it instead. in any case i think it might be out of the scope of the issue.
         (i made no real distinction between types on my end anyways).
         hmm about 32-bit types on 64 bit machine i'm not sure if there's an elegant way to solve
         this; see, i let sbcl's existing argument packer deal with padding and offsetting.
         i prefer being verbose as a workaround using prefered offsetting/alignment attributes
         on gcc's end or on the lisp alien type end.

         tbh at this point i had my fun with this issue and while it's nice to have i
         don't care all that much about the beer money. so if anyone wanna improve this thing or try
         something different he/she is very welcome, hopefully we'll share both.
         i'm just really out of time for this issue, as another semester is coming my way
         and with things being crazy as they are right now.