SBCL

  1. Bug #2031235
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 2031235

Revision history for this message
Antonis Kanouras (antonis+ubuntuone) wrote :

Thank you for the fast response!

Re QEMU, I was afraid so. :-(

The number 100940122304 (actually a bit more than 94 GiB!) is constant among many of these crashes, even over different SBCL versions.

The message "no size function for object at..." varies between SBCL and/or QEMU versions, however.

I also just noticed that the memory address of the object in question is in unmapped space.

I will keep poking at this, hopefully I'll eventually come up with a test case that's useful for QEMU devs.