Comment 2 for bug 1996942
Revision history for this message
| Andrew Patterson (liate) wrote Re: [Bug 1996942] Re: sbcl 2.2.10 fails to build on arm64 | #2 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
eee2d0b
(Get the code!)
On Thu, 2022-11-17 at 22:33GMT, Christophe Rhodes
<email address hidden> wrote:
> Thanks. Can you try the attached patch? (Something similar
> might need
> to be done for other architectures).
The build is successful with the patch.
Is there a reason why make.sh doesn't fail when make-host-1.sh
fails? It seems like debugging would be easier if the entire
build failed at the first failure, rather than when a dependency
is missing later in the process.