SBCL

  1. Bug #1760827
  2. Comment #6

Comment 6 for bug 1760827

Revision history for this message
Siebe de Vos (s.de.vos) wrote :

dougk wrote:
> That said, I think the documentation is not _requiring_ that you not
> decrement the timeout. I'm not sure why users perceive that it says that.
> It's saying "here is a usage pattern". ymmv.

And the coder of wait-on-gate bought in on that usage pattern, which is clearly a bug.