Comment 3 for bug 1734959
Revision history for this message
| Christophe Rhodes (csr21-cantab) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
the COMPLEX type is a bit weird, though: (COMPLEX <x>) means the complex type whose elements match <x>, and all other types of the same representation -- it's a bit like an array type. I'm not claiming that the COMPLEX type algebra is bug-free, but I don't think any of these examples is strictly speaking wrong.