Comment 4 for bug 1733400

Stas Boukarev <email address hidden> writes:

> I fixed it to the intention of SBCL's typep, which may not intersect
> with some interpretations of the standard.

I'm not convinced, but in case you are, can you describe sbcl's
intention of typep in this instance well enough for it to go in the
manual?

Christophe