SBCL

  1. Bug #1697528
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 1697528

Revision history for this message
Syll (syll) wrote : Re: Memory corruption in SBCL 1.3.18

Thank you okflo. I don't know why I dont't get the whole backtrace here...

I just posted a bug on cl+ssl tracker : https://github.com/cl-plus-ssl/cl-plus-ssl/issues/48

I only get the error with SBCL 1.3.18 and the backtrace I get is not really useful. Mayby okflo could send more precise information to cl+ssl ? They have modified code on master about this part of cl+ssl but I get the "same" (?) error with this version.