Log in / Register
SBCL
Overview
Code
Bugs
Blueprints
Translations
Answers
Bug #1337069
Comment #1
Comment 1 for bug 1337069
Revision history for this message
Stas Boukarev (stassats)
wrote
on 2014-07-03
:
#1
Shouldn't it be the other way around? (* x 2.1 3.1) shouldn't be folded into (* x (* 2.1 3.1))?
Shouldn't it be the other way around? (* x 2.1 3.1) shouldn't be folded into (* x (* 2.1 3.1))?
Shouldn't it be the other way around? (* x 2.1 3.1) shouldn't be folded into (* x (* 2.1 3.1))?