On 10.04.2014 13:46, Stas Boukarev wrote:
> There was no licensing information previously, now there is, how
> compatible is it with the rest of SBCL? It looks ok to me, but IANAL.
>
That LICENSE file has always been in the repository though probably was
omitted last time when Paul made the initial commit to SBCL.
It is the standard BSD 3-clause license, so it should be OK. If not, I
will adapt as advised.
On 10.04.2014 13:46, Stas Boukarev wrote:
> There was no licensing information previously, now there is, how
> compatible is it with the rest of SBCL? It looks ok to me, but IANAL.
>
That LICENSE file has always been in the repository though probably was
omitted last time when Paul made the initial commit to SBCL.
It is the standard BSD 3-clause license, so it should be OK. If not, I
will adapt as advised.
Regs,
Stephan