(In reply to comment #66) > This is entirely inappropriate to take in a security/stability release.
I thought it was debated that the follow-up 1.9.0.x/1.9.1 could be more than that. Anyway, 'wanted‑next=?' then?
(In reply to comment #66)
> This is entirely inappropriate to take in a security/stability release.
I thought it was debated that the follow-up 1.9.0.x/1.9.1 could be more than that.
Anyway, 'wanted‑next=?' then?