Comment 5 for bug 307009
Revision history for this message
| Massimiliano Mirra (bard-hyperstruct) wrote | #5 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
1b1ed1a
(Get the code!)
> So apparently, SP publishes its features whereas it should not.
It's installed and active, thus it should.
> Was wondering if there would be a way to bind a JID, a connection and a set of features and identities. This would help to avoid connection conflicts and would allow to customize the identity element.
No, and it is not planned.
> It looks like Entity Capabilities would be a nice feature request for x4m, wouldn't it ? :)
Just one of very very many. :)