Comment 3 for bug 484502
Revision history for this message
| dot dot dot (dotdotdotdeactivated-deactivatedaccount) wrote | #3 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
I hate to argue semantics, but this is more of a design flaw than a bug. The original specification as part of the framework dictated that they should be handled in the module conf files and they ARE in fact handled as such. Thus, as the expected behavior does not deviate from the design specification, this is not a bug.
Now, more along the lines of whether I think this was a good design choice to include in the specification?... I certainly do not. I agree that they should be handled in the manner in which you describe. I however would call this a feature request at this point as we need to be recode the framework/modules to handle this proposed behavior.