Comment 2 for bug 480985

I think we can do a dump. Our local instance we aren't going to be able to make publicly accessible - just using it on local net...

Chamindra - Ravith is looking for a data dump of the db so can look at one of the bugs - could we use the snapshot module for that?

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: <email address hidden> [mailto:<email address hidden>] On Behalf Of
> ravithb
> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 1:40 AM
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: [Bug 480985] Re: Organization located at first or second level
> of location does not provide 3rd level coverage
>
> Is there a live instance with data, for me to reproduce this issue? or
> at least a data dump from a instance with this type of data? Please
> attach if any.
>
> --
> Organization located at first or second level of location does not
> provide 3rd level coverage
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480985
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Sahana RELIEF Experiments: New
>
> Bug description:
> In the organization registry - an organization when registered must be
> located according to Sahana's location hierarchy.
>
> Here at Camp Roberts, we are using a three-tiered hierarchy of State -
> County - City.
>
> We have County Authorities here that are providing services at the
> County level - providing coverage for all Cities in the County (we also
> have State Authorities that are doing the same for the state). So, for
> example, the County of Monterrey is providing Emergency Management
> Services at the State-County level. (CA-Monterey County)
>
> When you view reports - Drill Down Location Coverage - all Cities in
> Monterey County should thus be considered covered for Emergency
> Management.
>
> This does not work now - cities are shown as uncovered for that
> service.
>
> Same for top level coverage - something provided at the top or State
> level should privide coverage at all son/daughter